Like our test, the Puget benchmark includes image resizing and many blur effects, but it also adds the especially intense Content Aware Fill and Photo Merge tasks. One emerging benchmark is from Puget Systems, a small firm that builds PCs tailor-made to the complex workflows of digital artists. Other tests use alternate workflows that tax a computer’s resources in different ways. While our test uses many "classic" filters and effects that aren’t necessarily optimized to show off the capabilities of modern processors like the M1, we believe it’s representative of many real-world workflows. Gains Depend on the Benchmark Composition Here is the breakdown of how long our 10 test filters took on the new M1 version of the software (version 22.3), compared with how long it takes when we forced the same version to run in the Rosetta 2 emulation layer: These include resizing the image, applying Watercolor and Stained Glass effects, and using several types of blur filters. While the test has evolved slightly over the years, many of the operations haven’t changed much since Photoshop CS6 was released nearly a decade ago. Our test involves timing how long it takes to apply a series of 10 filters and effects to a JPG image. Adobe notes that some of these operations “feel noticeably faster,” which will likely gratify photographers and other digital artists who use Photoshop all day long.Įvery artist uses Photoshop differently, of course, and so does every benchmark test. They include opening and running filters, and compute-heavy operations like Content-Aware Fill and Select Subject.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |